40 years ago, scientists predicted climate change. And hey, they were right. This month the world has been celebrating the 50th anniversary of Neil Armstrong setting foot on the Moon. But this week sees another scientific anniversary, perhaps just as important for the future of civilisation.

Forty years ago, a group of climate scientists sat down at Woods Hole in Massachusetts for the first meeting of the “Ad Hoc Group on Carbon Dioxide and Climate”. It led to the preparation of what became known as the Charney Report – the first comprehensive assessment of global climate change due to carbon dioxide.

It doesn’t sound as impressive as landing on the Moon, and there certainly weren’t millions waiting with bated breath for the deliberations of the meeting.

But the Charney Report is an exemplar of good science, and the success of its predictions over the past 40 years has firmly established the science of global warming.

What is this ‘greenhouse gas’ you speak of?

Other scientists, starting in the 19th century, had already demonstrated that carbon dioxide was what we now call a “greenhouse gas”. By the 1950s, scientists were predicting warming of several degrees from the burning of fossil fuels. In 1972 John Sawyer, the head of research at the UK Meteorological Office, wrote a four-page paper published in Nature summarising what was known at the time, and predicting warming of about 0.6℃ by the end of the 20th century.

But these predictions were still controversial in the 1970s. The world had, if anything, cooled since the middle of the 20th century, and there was even some speculation in the media that perhaps we were headed for an ice age.

The meeting at Woods Hole gathered together about 10 distinguished climate scientists, who also sought advice from other scientists from across the world. The group was led by Jule Charney from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, one of the most respected atmospheric scientists of the 20th century.

The Report lays out clearly what was known about the likely effects of increasing carbon dioxide on the climate, as well as the uncertainties. The main conclusion of the Report was direct:

We estimate the most probable warming for a doubling of CO₂ to be near 3℃ with a probable error of 1.5℃.

In the 40 years since their meeting, the annual average CO₂ concentration in the atmosphere, as measured at Mauna Loa in Hawaii, has increased by about 21%. Over the same period, global average surface temperature has increased by about 0.66℃, almost exactly what could have been expected if a doubling of CO₂ produces about 2.5℃ warming – just a bit below their best estimate. A remarkably prescient prediction.

Author provided/The ConversationCC BY-ND

Reception of the article

Despite the high regard in which the authors of the Charney Report were held by their scientific peers at the time, the report certainly didn’t lead to immediate changes in behaviour, by the public or politicians.

But over time, as the world has continued to warm as they predicted, the report has become accepted as a major milestone in our understanding of the consequences our actions have for the climate. The current crop of climate scientists revere Charney and his co-authors for their insight and clarity.

Strong science

The report exemplifies how good science works: establish an hypothesis after examining the physics and chemistry, then based on your assessment of the science make strong predictions. Here, “strong predictions” means something that would be unlikely to come true if your hypothesis and science were incorrect.

In this case, their very specific prediction was that warming of between 1.5℃ and 4.5℃ would accompany a doubling of atmospheric CO₂. At the time, global temperatures, in the absence of their hypothesis and science, might have been expected to stay pretty much the same over the ensuing 40 years, cooled a bit, possibly even cooled a lot, or warmed a lot (or a little).

In the absence of global warming science any of these outcomes could have been feasible, so their very specific prediction made for a very stringent test of their science.

The Charney Report’s authors didn’t just uncritically summarise the science. They also acted sceptically, trying to find factors that might invalidate their conclusions. They concluded:

We have tried but have been unable to find any overlooked or underestimated physical effects that could reduce the currently estimated global warmings due to a doubling of atmospheric CO₂ to negligible proportions or to reverse them altogether.

The report, and the successful verification of its prediction, provides a firm scientific basis for the discussion of what we should do about global warming.

Over the ensuing 40 years, as the world warmed pretty much as Charney and his colleagues expected, climate change science improved, with better models that included some of the factors missing from their 1979 deliberations.

This subsequent science has, however, only confirmed the conclusions of the Charney Report, although much more detailed predictions of climate change are now possible.


An earlier version of this article referenced a meeting in Massachusetts. The meeting was at Woods Hole, but not at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.

7 COMMENTS

  1. Needed to create you this very small note in order to thank you so much once again over the pretty advice you have contributed on this page. It is really generous of people like you to grant unhampered exactly what a lot of folks would’ve distributed for an ebook to get some money on their own, principally seeing that you could have done it in the event you considered necessary. Those ideas in addition worked to provide a fantastic way to know that some people have a similar dream just as mine to find out many more with regards to this condition. I believe there are lots of more pleasurable moments ahead for those who read through your website.

  2. I precisely needed to say thanks all over again. I’m not certain what I would have carried out in the absence of these points discussed by you about such a area of interest. It became the horrifying setting in my position, however , being able to see a new professional fashion you resolved the issue took me to leap over delight. Extremely thankful for the information and hope that you are aware of an amazing job your are doing educating the others using your web site. I am sure you haven’t got to know any of us.

  3. I have to voice my admiration for your kind-heartedness supporting men who really need help with this one niche. Your special dedication to passing the solution throughout has been extraordinarily valuable and has specifically encouraged associates like me to achieve their dreams. The important tips and hints entails so much to me and especially to my peers. Thank you; from everyone of us.

  4. I and my buddies were actually checking the best secrets found on your web page while instantly developed a terrible feeling I had not expressed respect to the website owner for them. Those women were definitely for that reason joyful to study them and have seriously been having fun with them. Appreciation for simply being very accommodating and then for deciding on varieties of incredible tips most people are really needing to be aware of. My very own sincere regret for not expressing appreciation to you sooner.

  5. I together with my guys happened to be checking the nice techniques from your web page and then before long came up with a terrible feeling I had not thanked the website owner for those strategies. All of the guys had been totally happy to see them and have now simply been taking pleasure in these things. I appreciate you for indeed being considerably thoughtful and then for choosing varieties of helpful guides most people are really eager to learn about. My personal sincere apologies for not expressing appreciation to you sooner.

  6. I would like to express my appreciation to the writer for rescuing me from this type of setting. As a result of looking out through the search engines and obtaining methods which were not pleasant, I thought my life was done. Living without the presence of answers to the difficulties you have resolved through your entire write-up is a critical case, and the kind which could have in a negative way damaged my entire career if I hadn’t noticed the blog. That competence and kindness in touching the whole lot was precious. I am not sure what I would have done if I hadn’t encountered such a subject like this. I’m able to at this moment look ahead to my future. Thanks a lot very much for this impressive and results-oriented guide. I won’t be reluctant to suggest your web site to anyone who should receive assistance about this subject.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here